Call for Applications: PhD Position and Student Assistant Position in Organization Studies

We are hiring:

Please do not hesitate to contact me in advance in case any questions arise.

New Book Chapter: »Searching for Transformative Potential: Comparing Conceptualizations of Open, Inclusive and Alternative Organizations«

Together with my sister Laura and Katharina Kreissl, we were given the opportunity to contribute a chapter to “The Handbook of Organizing Economic, Ecological and Societal Transformation”, edited by Elke Weik, Chris Land and Ronald Hartz. In our contribution entitled “Searching for Transformative Potential: Comparing Conceptualizations of Open, Inclusive and Alternative Organizations”, we analyze scholarly approaches that explicitly imagine organizations as capable of ‘doing good’ under the labels of “open”, “inclusive” or “alternative. Check out the abstract below:

Continue reading “New Book Chapter: »Searching for Transformative Potential: Comparing Conceptualizations of Open, Inclusive and Alternative Organizations«”

»Taking Stock of Open Strategy«: Opening Panel at Oxford & Zurich Open Strategy Workshop

Opening Panel “Taking Stock of Open Strategy” (from right to left: Fleur Deken, Alex Wilson, Basak Yakis-Douglas, Julia Hautz, Leonhard Dobusch)

Right before attending the EGOS Colloquium in Milano, University of Zurich’s David Seidl hosted an international workshop on Open Strategy (co-organized with Richard Whittington, Oxford University). Thanks to the great organizing team, the panel as well as the other plenary sessions were streamed and the video recordings are online available. I had the honor to kick-off the opening panel on “Taking Stock of Open Strategy”.

Neuer juridikum-Aufsatz: »Hört die Signa(le): rechtspolitische Fragen und Ableitungen aus dem Fall der Signa-Gruppe«

Auch wenn ich seit meiner Promotion in meiner Forschung immer wieder rechtswissenschaftliche Themen, vor allem im Bereich des Immaterialgüterreechts, bearbeitet hatte, habe ich kaum in rechtswissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften publiziert. Umso mehr freut es mich, dass kürzlich ein gemeinsam mit Jakob Sturn (Momentum Institut) verfasster, rechtswissenschaftlicher Beitrag in der Zeitschrift juridikum über “rechtspolitische Fragen und Ableitungen aus dem Fall der Signa-Gruppe” erschienen ist.

Continue reading “Neuer juridikum-Aufsatz: »Hört die Signa(le): rechtspolitische Fragen und Ableitungen aus dem Fall der Signa-Gruppe«”

Researching Together: Innsbruck Organization Scholars convene at the 40th EGOS Colloquium in Milan

(from left to right: Sabine Bösl, Marilyn Poon, Richard Weiskopf, Aleksander Groth, Laverne Chore, Alwin Baumhöver, Julia Waldegger, Felix Schmid, Monica Nadegger, Anna Schneider, Milena Leybold, Leonhard Dobusch, Katharina Zangerle, Andrea Kastl, Bernadette Bullinger)

The motto of the 40th Colloquium of the European Group of Organization Studies (EGOS) in Milan was “Crossroads for Organizations: Time, Space and People.” To some degree, the group photo above is exactly the result of organizing time and space at a crossroads to gather all participants related to University of Innsbruck’s Department of Organization and Learning that were contributing to the event.

Continue reading “Researching Together: Innsbruck Organization Scholars convene at the 40th EGOS Colloquium in Milan”

Re:publica 2024: Von »Engaged Scholarship« zum Vortrag über »Boom, Bust & Benko«

In den letzten Jahren habe ich auf der spannendsten Digitalkonferenz Europas, der re:publica in Berlin, über Medienwandel im Allgemeinen und die digitale Transformation öffentlich-rechtlicher Medien im Besonderen gesprochen. Auch dieses Jahr habe ich gemeinsam mit NDR-Rundfunkrätin Beate Bäumer ein Meetup für “Öffentlich-Rechtliche auf der re:publica” moderiert, wobei der Fokus darauf lag, “Was Aufsichtsgremien jetzt lernen müssen. Erfahrungen und Tipps.”

Foto: D64 e.V.

Mein Hauptvortrag widmete sich jedoch jenem Thema, das mich im letzten Jahr mit Sicherheit am meisten beschäftigt hat: der Analyse und Erklärung des finanzialisierten Geschäftsmodells von René Benkos Signa-Gruppe.

Foto: @squadrat.bsky.social

Unter dem Titel “Boom, Bust und Benko: Was kümmert uns die Millionenpleite?” habe ich mich an einer ersten Antwort auf Fragen wie diese hier versucht:

Continue reading “Re:publica 2024: Von »Engaged Scholarship« zum Vortrag über »Boom, Bust & Benko«”

New Article in ‘Innovation: Organization & Management’: »Barracudas, Piranhas and crowds: making ideas valuable in pharmaceutical innovation through opening and closing practices of valuation«

Led by Katharina Zangerle, who collected data at a large pharmaceutical corporation in Austria and Switzerland, we are very happy to announce the first joint article by three members of the organization unit at the Department of Organization and Learning, as Katharina had teamed up with Richard Weiskopf and myself for crafting the article.

The study entitled “Barracudas, Piranhas and crowds: making ideas valuable in pharmaceutical innovation through opening and closing practices of valuation” is now available open access at Innovation: Organization & Management. The abstract reads as follows:

Attributing value to ideas is central in the journey from generating and elaborating ideas, to realising ‘creative’ products and processes. In this study, we explore the ways in which ideas are attributed value through practices of valuation in the innovation process. We examine valuation practices and intentionally and deliberately designed digital and analog spaces in pharmaceutical innovation across various stages of the ‘idea journey’. The findings shed light on the valuation of objects and emerging ideas as well as unveiling how pharmaceutical firms adapt valuation practices in times of crisis, when the imperative to generate novel solutions intensifies. The empirical case illustrates the interplay between ‘opening’ valuation practices, such as crowd votings facilitated by a digital ideation software, and ‘closing’ mechanisms, such as idea rankings within exclusive evaluation boards, or idea clustering through the digital device, as well as how these practices enable a working consensus on defining what qualifies as new and valuable within the organisation. While closing valuation with its quantifying practices might allow for efficient decision-making in organising novelty, it may turn out to be problematic when it comes to achieving organisational legitimacy in innovation processes. Balancing opening and closing mechanisms seems crucial in innovation processes, particularly in times of uncertainty. Taking a closer look at the spatial and temporal conditions and dynamics of valuation, as well as the role of digital technology in the production of value advances the understanding of how value is produced.

The research has been conducted in the realm of joint DFG and FWF research project on “Organized Creativity” and regulatory uncertainty in music and pharma.

Opening Keynote on ‘Science (Communication) and Wikipedia: Potentials and Pitfalls’

Recently I had the honor of providing the opening keynote to the conference “Enhancing the voice of science on Wikipedia: How universities can collaborate with the online encyclopedia in science communication”, taking place from April 9–11, 2024, at University of Innsbruck.

I seized the opportunity to reflect on the following questions:

  • How ‘scientific’ is Wikipedia?
  • How important is science for Wikipedia?
  • How important is Wikipedia for science?
  • How important is Wikipedia for our common knowledge?
  • What are potentials when science communication meets Wikipedia?
  • What are the pitfalls?
  • Is it worth it?

Please check out the video recording above and the slides below.

Five points I tell my students about citing and using Wikipedia

Foto: veryinformed.com at unsplash.com

While most academics and journalists, just like everybody else, heavily relies on Wikipedia for both private and professional purposes, it is quite common in among both these groups to scold anyone who openly admits doing so. For example, many lecturers tend to make fun of students citing Wikipedia and pride themselves in educating them that “Wikipedia is not a source” and, thus, cannot be cited in a seminar paper.

I not only strongly disagree with both tone and substance of such statements, but I regularly have to deal with insecurity and uncertainty among students with respect to the proper use of Wikipedia. The following list presents the five main points I try to bring across in such situations.

Continue reading “Five points I tell my students about citing and using Wikipedia”

Festrede zu “Reform und Zukunft des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks” beim Otto-Brenner-Preis 2023

In der Festrede anlässlich der Verleihung der Otto-Brenner-Preise für kritischen Journalismus 2023 habe ich in der laufenden Debatte eine provokant-optimistische These vertreten: Die besten Zeiten öffentlich-rechtlicher Medien liegen noch vor uns.

Das Manuskript meiner Rede ist in voller Länge bei Netzpolitik.org in der Reihe “Neues aus dem Fernsehrat” erschienen.