Discussion Proposal: Increasing Vaccine Access in a Shorter Time

As we have all experienced recently, to prevent pandemic outbreaks or mitigate an evolving pandemic crisis, it is of utmost importance to guarantee timely and global access to safe and effective vaccines. Through their pre-print, Milena Leybold (University of Innsbruck) and Konstantin Hondros (University of Duisburg-Essen) make a step towards opening a debate on “Increasing Vaccine Access in a Shorter Time. Alternative Regulatory Frameworks in Response to Pandemics.” 

População do DF conta com 47 tipos de vacinas e soros
Source: Agência Brasília, https://www.flickr.com/photos/64586261@N02/51330020291/
Continue reading “Discussion Proposal: Increasing Vaccine Access in a Shorter Time”

New Article in Organization Theory: »Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work«

I am very glad to announce that the article “Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work”, co-authored by Martin Friesl, Martin Brielmaier and myself, has been accepted for publication at Organization Theory and is already available online. Particularly the growing interest in open approaches to strategy, which at least formally invite broad audiences to participate in organizational strategy-making, was one of the reasons for writing this paper. Not just because an invitation to participate cannot hardly intrinsic motivation to actually contribute but also because inviting everyone does not guarantee that you will actually arrive at a more diverse and inclusive bunch of people (see also Dobusch et al., 2019). The abstract reads as follows:

An increasing body of work investigates the participation of a diverse set of actors in strategy making. We argue that extant research tends to gloss over a fundamental condition underpinning such participation: while participation may reflect a hierarchical mandate, insofar as it relates to the actual involvement of employees, it is the result of a process of self-selection. From this perspective, forms of participative strategizing are neither fully the outcome of deliberate top-down choice, nor do they form a random pattern that is subject to the whims of individual employees. Such forms of strategizing are rather, as we argue in this paper, based on an endogenous logic of whether and how an individual self-selects, and in turn involves her/himself in the process, or not. To conceptualize the broader phenomenon of strategy participation, we draw on practice theory to conceptualize how individuals knowingly choose to involve themselves in strategizing events and we develop in turn a process model of self-selection as an ongoing social accomplishment. This model elaborates different patterns of participation in strategy making (stabilizing and shifting trajectories) with variable emergent outcomes. We end the paper by discussing the implications of our theorizing for ongoing research on open and participatory strategizing, and for the body of work on strategy as practice.

The paper is open access available at Organization Theory. Summary threads ft. #1paper1meme can be found over at Mastodon and Twitter.

Re:publica 2023: Rundfunkbeitragsdebatte und Predictive Risk Analysis entlang von Lieferketten

Die jährlich in Berlin stattfindende re:publica ist wahrscheinlich eine der spannendsten und inklusivsten Digitalkonferenzen und für mich jedes Jahr ein Highlight in meinem Konferenzkalender. Dieses Jahr war ich mit einem Vortrag und als Teil eines Panels im Programm vertreten.

In meinem Vortrag habe ich versucht, den Bogen von der – auch in Österreich im Zuge der Einführung einer Haushaltsabgabe gerade aktuellen – Rundfunkbeitragsdebatte hin zur Vergesellschaftungsdebatte zu spannen, indem ich öffentlich-rechtliche Medien als wichtiges Beispiel für vergesellschaftete Organisationsformen unserer Zeit in den Blick genommen habe (Slides als PDF-Download).

Außerdem war ich gemeinsam mit Sabrina Zajak, Akhil C S und Lisa Basten Teil eines Panels zum Thema “Global Supply Chains – Digital Tools Between Empowerment And Control” und habe dort vor allem über den problematischen Einsatz von Predictive Risk Analysis-Tools zur Überwachung und Steuerung von globalen Lieferketten gesprochen – das Thema eines von der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung geförderten Forschungsprojekts.