Am 20. November 2019 lud die Bibliothek der Universität Innsbruck bereits zum zweiten Mal in diesem Jahr zur “Langen Nacht des Schreibens”. Ich durfte dabei einen Vortrag halten zum Thema “Warum sich Bloggen lohnt” – für WissenschaftlerInnen genauso wie für Studierende, zum Beispiel anlässlich ihrer Bachelor- oder Masterarbeit.
Angesichts des Themas ist es natürlich eine Selbstverständlichkeit, zumindest die Slides ebenfalls zu verbloggen und damit dem Titel des Vortrags auch praktisch zu entsprechen.
Together with my colleagues Taran Thune (University of Oslo) and Jochen Markard ( ETH Zurich), I am convening a track on “Sustainability Transitions: Bridging Systems and Organizational Perspectives to Tackle Grand Challenges” on the forthcoming EGOS Colloquium in Hamburg in July 2020.
to the theme
live in a world facing a variety of grand challenges connected to environmental
and societal sustainability, including food, water and energy security, climate
change, natural disasters, poverty and inequality. How societies and
organizations deal with such challenges, and commit to developing more
sustainable futures, while discontinuing unsustainable businesses and practices
is a key concern and research topic (Ferraro et al., 2015; Geels et al., 2017;
George et al., 2016; Markard et al., 2012).
This sub-theme will bring together scholars who study grand sustainability
challenges and transformation from different perspectives, including systems
and organizations. We are particularly interested in contributions that explore
new approaches, perspectives, and methods.
On 26 October 2015, BBC News published an article entitled China ‘social credit’: Beijing sets up huge system. It describes how the Chinese government is building an ‘omnipotent “social credit” system that is meant to rate each citizen’s trustworthiness’. Warnings about the advent of ‘digital dictatorship’ and phrases like ‘Big Data meets Big Brother’ have proliferated in research and Western public media ever since, and they reflect a rapidly growing focus on the contemporary global process whereby power and control become entwined with digitalization and result in new and often concerning forms of transparency.
It’s that time of the year again. The winter semester just started, the trees are turning from green to yellow, and, most importantly, the annual OS ConJunction Day is coming up! This year, it’s all about creativity and organizing. How is creativity organized? What role does creativity play in organizations? How do organizations make creativity valuable? These and many more questions will be explored in talks and a panel discussion. After the formal part, we look forward to nice conversations over food and drinks at Brennpunkt Coffee Competence.
November 29th 2019 at 3:00 p.m.
Kaiser Leopold Saal, Faculty of Theology
Karl-Rahner-Platz 3, 6020 Innsbruck
3:00 p.m. Meet and Greet
3:15 p.m. Welcome
Prof. Leonhard Dobusch & Prof. Richard Weiskopf
3:30 p.m. Research 1: How organizations make creativity valuable
Prof. Birthe Soppe
4:00 p.m. Panel Discussion: Creativity at work
5:00 p.m. Coffee break
5:30 p.m. Research 2: How creativity is organized
Prof. Elke Schüssler, University of Linz
6:00 p.m. Crossing Genealogies
Graduation speech and welcoming fresh(wo)men
6:30 p.m. Concluding Thoughts
7:00 p.m. Eat and Meet
Food, drinks, and conversation at Brennpunkt Coffee Competence
We kindly ask you to register for the OS ConJunction Day before November 15th 2019 under the following link. We are looking forward to your participation and hope to welcome many of you!
Inspired by a blog post about the dangers of predatory publishing and open peer review as a potential response, Maximilian Heimstädt and I decided to dig deeper into the issue. Specifically, we were able to get access to some data on (potentially) predatory journals in organization and management studies. Based upon the analysis of this data we developed some initial ideas – provocations for debate – regarding the potentials of open peer review for our own discipline. The article has now been published in the journal Management Learning:
Predatory journals have emerged as an unintended consequence of the Open Access paradigm. Predatory journals only supposedly or very superficially conduct peer review and accept manuscripts within days to skim off publication fees. In this provocation piece, we first explain how predatory journals exploit deficiencies of the traditional peer review process in times of Open Access publishing. We then explain two ways in which predatory journals may harm the management discipline: as an infrastructure for the dissemination of pseudo-science and as a vehicle to portray management research as pseudo-scientific. Analyzing data from a journal blacklist, we show that without the ability to validate their claims to conduct peer review, most of the 639 predatory management journals are quite difficult to demarcate from serious journals. To address this problem, we propose open peer review as a new governance mechanism for management journals. By making parts of their peer review process more transparent and inclusive, reputable journals can differentiate themselves from predatory journals and additionally contribute to a more developmental reviewing culture. Eventually, we discuss ways in which editors, reviewers, and authors can advocate reform of peer review.
Ziemlich genau zwölf Jahre nach der Ankündigung des ersten Momentum-Kongresses 2007 ist daraus im September 2019 mit dem Momentum Institut das Experiment eines “Think Tanks der Vielen” hervorgegangen. Wie schon beim Kongress bin ich Mitgründer und versuche als wissenschaftlicher Leiter den Dialog und wechselseitigen Transfer zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und Zivilgesellschaft zu unterstützen.
Als eines der ersten Projekte ist seit kurzem das Parlagram online verfügbar. Das Online-Tool macht die Debatten im österreichischen Nationalrat für die Vielen durchsuchbar. Worüber reden die gewählten Volksvertreterinnen und Volksvertreter im Parlament eigentlich? Welche Themen und Anliegen finden Gehör, was bleibt im wörtlichen Sinne unerwähnt?